Cigarette butts are non-biodegradable and can clog water systems if thrown recklessly. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Second hand smoke has been proven to be harmful to smokers and non-smokers. As said by Dr. We have banned drinking and driving because it affects us but we have not done anything about smoking.
Passive smoking is the inhaling of second hand smoke. Groups not really in favor of smoking bans say Disadvantages of smoking in public places essay they are not effective since smokers will just be usually told to leave and that penalties are not stiff.
What was the essay question in full? They are not effective. Smoking should be banned from public places Audience: Smoking ban is a policy that prohibits smoking in public places like restaurants, workplaces, parks, malls, government offices and schools, among others.
Get Access The disadvantages of smoking Essay Sample Smoking is a form of addiction depending on the sedative effect of nicotine on the brain and nervous system. Thoughtful with living longer and healthier lives, the harmful effects of habits and live styles have come under significant considerations.
There will always be people who will advocate for banning smoking in public places for concerns on health issues and fire hazards.
Smoking during pregnancy damages the unborn child, and also increases the chances of sudden infant death syndrome. Consequently there will be no cigarette buttes littered all over the place affecting the environment negatively. People will see it as a government endorsement for a healthier lifestyle of everybody.
Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body. If employees smoke less, chances are, the risk of getting sick is minimized. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.
They say that the government earns from high taxes paid by tobacco manufacturers and smokers. They mentioned that this can even lead to increase cases of DUI fatalities since smokers might drive to other places just so they can smoke.
However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. These days, allowing people smoking in public areas has become a major problem. By banning smoking in all public areas, the government shows support for the fact that smoking is bad, and it helps to set changes to the mind set in people reminding them that smoking is not a healthy habit.
Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. We discourage people from jumping off buildings and from shooting themselves, yet we allow them to slowly kill themselves. The nonsmoking homeowner has the ethical and legal right to stipulate policy in his or her home, and an offender should not be allowed to exert pressure, knowingly or otherwise, on the homeowner.
The first point is, in Quebec, the laws forbid smoking in almost every area. According to published research, an estimated 1, Americans die each day from a smoking related illness.
From the conclusion on these studies, we should ban smoking activities in all Public Places. With banning smoking in public places, there will be lesser cigarette butts and lesser toxic garbage that can be stuck in water systems.
An individual spends a large sum of money on cigarettes. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore.
Then a variety of arguments for smoking in public places presented.
They argue that people should have the autonomy to decide on what kind of lifestyle they will have. Moreover, smoking bans in workplaces and pharmaceuticals also contribute to cleaner indoor quality as well as maintaining cleanliness.
In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas.
Smokers often spend thousands of dollars a year that literally just go up in smoke. Most of the cigarette butts that are littered all over the place end up the rivers, and in the bellies of fishes and other aquatic creatures.Oct 09, · Argumentative Essay On Smoking In All Public Places.
From the conclusion on these studies, we should ban smoking activities in all Public Places. The first point is, in Quebec, the laws forbid smoking in almost every area.
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Smoking; Compare And Contrast Essay; Help! Help Corrected My Argumentative Essay. Here is where we find the issue, when it comes to smoking in public areas, and one’s freedom.
Smoking in Public Places Should be banned Argumentative Justin Brennan. Additional info about argumentative essay smoking in public places.
Initiative 7 in 10 of you do.
Passive smoking is the inhaling of second hand smoke. Smoking IN public places essays For a long time now many people have different views about smoking in public places.
Smokers feel it is their right to smoke where and when they want. On the other hand non-smokers feel. Keeping these statistics in mind, governments all over the world have implemented bans on smoking tobacco in public places, to the joy of non-smokers and the dismay of those for whom a cigarette is a permanent extension of the lips.
Sep 29, · Check out our top Free Essays on Disadvantages Of Smoking In Public Places to help you write your own Essay. Ban Smoking In Public Places Essay Banning smoking in public places Before people start smoking they have a choice, but once you are a smoker that choice goes and you then become an addict.
Smoking is the inhalation and exhalation of .Download